Vipassana vs Samatha Meditation, which should you be doing? In the original Pali texts of Theravadan Buddhism, Vipassana and Samatha are described as two distinct meditation methods that lead to different qualities of consciousness. But they are not in opposition to each other.
As the practice progresses, the mind enters deeper and deeper levels of concentration, and as it does so an immense feeling of calmness pervades the whole body and mind leading to a state of tranquility or rapture, the true nature of which can only be understood through direct experience. This temporary feeling lasts until the meditator ends the session.
To enter the first jhana, we start with something called access concentration, which is being fully present with the object of the meditation. If you’re focus is on the breath, for instance, you might notice that it becomes very shallow and subtle. This is the access concentration level. What you don’t do when you experience this is take a deep breath! This will simply disturb your meditation and you’ll be back to square one. When your body and consciousness is at rest, the body does not need a lot of oxygen. Leave the breath alone.
When involved in a Samatha practice, it’s critical in the attainment of the jhanas that you should not strive to achieve them. You will fail. All you can do is generate the conditions out of which the arise. Recognize when you’ve established these conditions, then patiently wait for the to come and find you.
To attain a jhana is no easy task. When it happens, however, it’s a monumental event in your consciousness and you won’t be left wondering if ‘that was it’. It’s very identifiable and will result in a radical shift in the body/mind resulting in the arising of an intense feeling of ecstasy. This feeling of ecstasy is, however, of no practical value to you other than as a marker of having achieved something quite profound on your journey with meditation.
Vipassana, invented by the Buddha in part to address the issue of the transitory nature of the outcome of Samatha, uses the deep levels of concentration that are developed in a Samatha practice as a tool to chip away at the illusion that clouds an understanding of the true nature of everything. Vipassana is a slow and gradual process of expanding awareness into the true nature of the manifest universe and everything in it.
The path of Vipassana is not a quick one. There is no instant enlightenment to be had, but enlightenment is the ultimate destination, though it can take many lifetimes to achieve. Once achieved, it’s permanent. There is no going back. A significant difference between Vipassana and Samatha when seen in isolation is that Vipassana certainly does have the potential to lead you to a state of supreme enlightenment, whereas Samatha doesn’t. But keep in mind that Vipassana requires the application of Samatha for it to be truly effective. The two methods have a profound symbiotic relationship.
Vipassana is an ancient and rigorous system of training the mind through a codified set of exercises that allows the practitioner to become more and more aware of their own life experience on all levels.
Most people think they are aware of their life and the world around them already, but this is an illusion. Mostly we are paying so little attention to the details of life as it unfolds that we might as well be asleep. We’re not even paying enough attention to realise that we are not paying attention! So, we continue to live in a dream, utterly devoid from the reality all around us.
In a Vipassana practice, we learn to fully experience the sensations of touch and smell, to notice deeply the changes taking place in these experiences. We learn to observe and be present with our own thoughts without jumping into them and seeing the world from their point of view. In a Vipassana practice, we see the truth of the impermanence and selflessness of all phenomena. And we discover deep down how unsatisfactory all of this is.
Two Different Types of Meditation
The notion that we can set up Vipassana in opposition to Samatha is an erroneous one. As I’ve said, there is no Vipassana vs Samatha. Whilst it’s true that the Buddha taught both methods, it’s also true that he never separated them. In all his teachings, the two methods are parts of a single whole. The Buddha made it clear that the purpose of meditation practice is to get the mind to settle and be stable enough that it can perceive things steadily and see them for what they truly are.
Through building a laser-like and intensely focused level of concentration, desire simply melts away. Concentration works directly against it, and it is desire that is the source of all our suffering.
Vipassana in the West: Modern Mindfulness
‘Mindfulness’ is a word that is used extensively in the West to describe a version of the Buddha’s Vipassana practice that was largely developed at the University of Massachusetts Medical Centre in 1979, but Jon Kabat-Zinn. Kabat-Zinn took the Buddha’s deeply spiritual teaching on meditation, stripped it of its spiritual content and applied it in a therapeutic context in the form of his programme, called ‘Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction’.
Over the years the MBSR model has been adapted numerous times to facilitate therapeutic benefits in a variety of different contexts. It’s being used very successfully in combination with cognitive therapy as Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy, it’s being used to help people with addiction problems and in sports settings to help athletes achieve their potential. It’s being used in pain management programmes, and it’s being used in companies all over the world to reduce work-related stress, improve productivity and increase employee focus on their tasks. It’s even being linked to such everyday activities as cooking, flower arranging, walking, and of course the making of art. Mindfulness is becoming deeply embedded in the strata of Western culture and it’s now big business.
Western mindfulness is very much limited to the therapeutic outcomes of the practice with no real possibility of engaging with its true potential.
Whether this will change remains to be seen. Modern mindfulness is in its infancy and evolving all the time. There is certainly a growing desire, by more and more practitioners to explore its full potential, as they discover mindfulness’ deep spiritual roots. To do that properly requires that attention be given to the role of Samatha and what that might mean for a full engagement with the practice for there to be a full flowering of Vipassana within Western societies.